A man seen in prison and it is implied he has been raped. He is slapped and has blood on his face.
Two topless women sit in a hot tub as men video them for a pornographic film. At one point they lick each other’s tongues.
A main character is shown wearing tight Speedo underwear in a few scenes.
At a pool party men and women wear swimsuits and bikinis that show cleavage.
Scenes of pornography, although they are generally not overly graphic. Some thrusting and moaning, and several instances of topless female nudity.
A topless woman jumps out of a box during a magic show, and we see her nude briefly.
A gay man tries to kiss another man who is straight and rejects him in disgust.
There is a sex scene in a car that is being filmed for a porno. The scene is not graphic and cuts to another scene frequently. Only a man’s buttocks is shown.
A high school couple is seen in bed, in their underwear. They are shown kissing a few times. The girl compliments the boy on how massive his penis is and how good he is at sex. But penis is not shown.
A boy imitates oral sex towards a girl in his class. She is very offended and she leaves the class.
Man and woman have sex, includes breast nudity, but no male nudity. It is filmed for a pornographic movie.
A man and woman have sex at a pool party where a man is on top of a woman, and a brief instance of his buttocks. Many people stand over them, watching.
A man asks a male and female teenager to have sex in front of him. The female strips off her dress, leaving her nude, and then climbs on top of the male. The strap making out as the view moves to the man watching.
A man picks up another man in his car and asks him to masturebate in front of him. The man starts, but is told to do it faster and harder, but then says he cannot and stops.
A teenage boy says that men pay him to masturbate in front of them.
Two masturbation scenes, both of the same character. The first is somewhat uncomfortable, and the other is more disturbing than anything.
A totally naked woman asks a man to “fuck her in the ass”. He accepts but the act is never shown. Breasts and brief genitalia are shown during the scene.
Two scenes of non-graphic fellatio. And two scenes of non-graphic male masturbation.
A man exposes his penis for about 10 seconds. His genitals are briefly exposed along with a prosthetic penis.
Graphic sexual dialogue during much of the film, although it’s not overly vulgar.


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


It is said that Paul Thomas Anderson is a genius, so when I look at Boogie Nights, I’m a little unkind. I want to see if there is a place with unsophisticated skills, bursting ambition or exquisite in all aspects

Unfortunately, the uninhibited night is full of fun. Paul Thomas Anderson is a true genius!! Not that Boogie Nights is impeccable, but that no defect can hide it. This is a classic. The longer the interval, the more you can feel the spirit of becoming famous in one fell swoop. This is true for Eddie, the protagonist of the film, and equally brilliant for Anderson, the director. At the age of 27, I adored such a sophisticated biographical film (and my eyes turned green with jealousy).

With the ups and downs of Dirk diggler’s career as the main line, uninhibited night is about the history of American pornographic films in the 1970s and 1980s.

In addition to the sleek and completely non novice directing methods, the well-structured genius script (also from Paul Thomas Anderson, ° Д °), smooth editing and faithful retro scenes In addition to the basic elements of these films, the setting of uninhibited night is not only loyal to the 1970s-1980s, but also creatively reflects some sense of design, especially the appearance and dress of pornographic actress. Even from a modern point of view, it is gorgeous and beautiful ~ ~ even very dignified.

In this film, the more wonderful is the performance. At that time, most actors and directors were just fledgling. Although they achieved the same famous Mark Wahlberg, Julianne Moore and Heather Graham many years later, it seems that no star showed a performance significantly superior to the role of uninhibited night (Philip Seymour Hoffman is not counted. The role here is too small). Even if the stars of that year are reunited, the success of uninhibited night is difficult to replicate. In 1997, just because of the lack of fame, all the actors were as conscientious as Anderson and appeared sincere and hard-working for any scale of performance. Under the command of a well prepared and talented director, there was such a nearly perfect achievement as uninhibited night.

The brilliance of uninhibited night affects every role, even those little supporting actors. After careful experience, each play is quite interesting. The ups and downs of an industry can be seen from any link, including those little people who are not valued. For example, the wife is always the assistant director of cheating and the little assistant of gay Д °), Congliang’s Black Bride Not many appearances, the performance of grasping personality is good, and explains the context. After reading it, it makes a deep impression that it is not weaker than the protagonist. I remember that the sponsor, the colonel, stared at Dirk diggler’s lower body shortly after he appeared. He had fantasies. On the surface, he was silent and his mouth was crooked, which had exposed his ambition to win us dollars.

If it’s a pity, there are many characters. In the second half of the time, it needs space to explain the development of various characters, which reduces the weight of the protagonist diggler, which is not as good as the first half.

As a whole, I don’t think Mark Wahlberg’s performance has much advantage. But the first half of the performance of the 26-year-old “senior” dressed as 17 high school students is more attractive. In contrast, the ML Rollergirl played by Heather Graham is as natural as eating, which is particularly amazing.

It seems that the most brilliant is the “mother” played by Julianne Moore. Motherhood and chaos are in place.

What shines with the performance is the details. Many details of Boogie Nights are amazing (especially in the 1990s), and they are not meaningful. Most characters’ words, deeds and small actions are not only notes for identity and character, but also closely related to their subsequent whereabouts.

The paragraphs that can best reflect the skills of screenwriters and directors come from those singing and dancing group dramas and continuous erotic parties.

Like diggler’s first encounter with reed, his dialogue is three words and his character is vivid; Next, the scenes around Jack’s mansion and swimming pool are dazzling, and all kinds of people come on stage, shuttling constantly and with distinctive personality; After that is diggler’s Virgo, which makes the AV scene full of suspense and lively; Then turn to the scene of diggler singing and dancing in the nightclub, and brand a clear sense of the times ~ ~ (°) Д °! Where is Anderson like 27 years old???!)

In the second half of the film, the rhythm is still excited and the tone turns gray. Some of them are slightly “mainstream” today, but it is still of great practical significance to appear in a film with the motif of pornography.

For example, Maggie and her husband fought to win the son, and then sobbed Based on the fragment theory alone, it seems that there are deja vu scenes in other films, but the next interpretation is very persuasive. She is not a sad or degenerate concept, nor is she formally humanized. The woman is sometimes mature, sometimes out of control, takes a lot of drugs, and often breaks out of maternal love, but she doesn’t repent ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a state that she doesn’t know what she wants to grasp. She holds it very forcefully. Because the chaos is out of pattern, it looks real.

Personally, if there are some imbalances in the plot, it is mainly the scene of the black couple with fever in the stereo getting rich in the cake shop. It seems a little artificial in the whole article. This is a complete coincidence. The probability of occurrence is too low. Compared with the subsequent scene of robbing drug dealers, it is too dramatic to be explained by absurdity.

Similarly, the parallel splicing of three tragic experiences (loan rejection, AV in the back seat and diggler selling) seems more or less deliberate today. Although it led to the climax of the film ~ ~ ~ ~ this idea was still very talented ten years ago, but it was handled more low-key and seemed more real.

Another promising attempt of uninhibited night is the picture. Split screen lens, telling with the help of camera in the lens, picture in picture (even including real oil painting), parody action film, documentary effect facing the lens Colorful and orderly, and quite creative.

At the same time, Anderson’s talent is also reflected in his musical skills. The background music selected for uninhibited night is not only emotionally appropriate, reshaping the 1980s, but also charming to enjoy OST alone. The scene of Mark Wahlberg’s hard work in the studio is absolutely the essence of the movie. The feeling of desperation and ignorance is just the beginning and end of the story. (for the soundtrack of the film, the detailed notes of the director can be heard in the new DVD review track. In the special collection, there are separate clips of each selected song, with on-screen lyrics)

Even if it is interspersed with joking and absurdity, strong rendering and simple recording color, Paul Thomas Anderson can always collect several styles skillfully in time, and finally return to a stable tone. It makes the whole uninhibited night between realism and dramatization, which is both readable and memorable.

What’s more, there is the end that solves all suspense and is ultimately tough ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I only finished watching Boogie Nights today, and I can appreciate Thomas Anderson’s intentions. The film was shot in 1997, and it can be seen that Anderson is a little reserved. If some of the humor is expressed today, I believe Anderson will play bolder and sharper, and the irony will be stronger.

In addition, boogie literally means swing. This already talented “uninhibited night” will be more enjoyable if it deviates more from the scale on themes such as human nature, conscience and care, “Boogie” is more violent and its expression is colder!!! (this may be the only place where Paul Thomas Anderson appears “young” — there is no lack of caution in boldness, which may be an advantage, because the space worthy of the audience’s expectation is very broad).

==============================================

In any case, Paul Thomas Anderson’s talent is beyond doubt. Magnolia and punch drunk love have further marked his talent after uninhibited night. I can’t wait to see there will be blood!!!

Over the years, who dares to invite Daniel Day Lewis except Martin Scorsese???? Of course, Paul Thomas Anderson!!!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here