Women wear skin tight, cleavage revealing clothing.
Captain America briefly kisses a woman
Men wear clothing to show muscles, also topless male nudity


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


First, as Chris Evans said, marvel has a mature formula for making movies successful. I wanted to be a commercial entertainment film. After all, it has its own restrictions and rules, so I went to the cinema with the original intention of “watching an action film that plays very well”. As for the plot, I guess it is just to apply the formula, so there is no need to expect too much.

So I was surprised after reading it, because it looked much better than expected. In a word, the civil war of MCU is no longer the civil war of 616 universe in the cartoon, but the captain is still the captain, the iron man is still the iron man, the winter soldier is still the winter soldier, and everyone is still themselves.

1、 About the overall impression

There is not much to say about the wonderful action drama. At the beginning, it was because Team America 2 had the hardline action style of the espionage series. This film continues to carry forward it. The action design is beautiful, fierce, simple and practical. Everyone has his own characteristics, and pays attention to teamwork. The combination technology is dazzling and enjoyable.

As for the story, my personal impression is that this is a marvel film that rarely makes me feel sincere in recent two years. Although there is still a “Marvel film formula”, it does tell a complete story seriously and vividly. The story is more complicated than I thought. There are three branches: panther, ZEMO and avenger. The story is very clear, organized and logical. It advances layer by layer. Although there are many roles, the primary and secondary roles are clear, and each performs his own duties. I didn’t expect to cover up the simplicity of the plot by piling up jokes, and I didn’t think some characters, such as ZEMO, were wasted. Most of the characters in the film serve for the storyline, because there is no single film plan for them in the short term (except panther and spider), so the director doesn’t waste his pen and ink on unnecessary characterization. Everyone has a prominent focus. I appreciate it so far. Because the contradictions among the Avengers are already very full, there is no need to vigorously shape an evil villain to set off the heroes. ZEMO doesn’t play much and plays more to promote the plot, but his self-analysis at the end succinctly and accurately tells the character’s tragedy and crime motivation, which makes me immediately understand his reason and realize that he is one of the few intelligent, organized and methodical villains in Marvel films, And to some extent, they are excellent villains who do evil and succeed.

And I like the lines of this film very much. They are in line with the characteristics of the characters. They are concise, witty and moderately humorous. They are very good.

2、 About the plot

Regardless of the publicity strategy of the film and the information conveyed by various interviews, I personally don’t think it is really making an in-depth discussion and debate on “which is better, freedom and regulation”. Although the story mainly revolves around the contradiction of “whether the monitoring and control of government agencies should override the personal freedom and choice of superheroes for the sake of public safety and social order”, it is, after all, an American team film, just like American team 2. It has obviously come to the conclusion that personal freedom and rights are more important. The whole story is pushed forward on this basis, removing the attributes that may cause obvious controversy, simplifying and clarifying the plot, which obviously makes people feel that politicians have too many things to consider, so they don’t care much about the truth. In the end, the government will not be really reliable. Instead of giving up freedom for security, it’s better to believe in the strength and judgment of mankind (Heroes).

Because of this, the captain and iron man have always been fighting in a harmonious and friendly atmosphere based on the principle of “friendship first and competition second”. Although they fight hard, they fight on the matter and have no resentment against each other; Tony’s side is not a hardline registrant who stands completely with the United Nations. They are just following their ideas on maintaining social order. When they find that the government’s behavior has deviated from their original intention, they quickly adjust their position to respond and change. So I saw five sixths of the film and didn’t feel the expected serious and cruel opposition between life and death. I just felt that it was a running in process between the internal members of the Avengers. Although the quarrel was fierce, the United Front was united at the critical moment.

So when I saw the last sixth, I suddenly found that signing the agreement was just a representation. The real core of this film was revenge. Panther, ZEMO, Captain Winter Soldier, iron man, these three story lines are all based on revenge. They each have their own hatred. They choose different solutions because of their different personalities. Finally, they lead to the whole story and get different results; Their hatred is intertwined, cause and effect, and the reasons for revenge are understandable.

But as the captain said, we try our best to save more people, but that doesn’t mean everyone. If you can’t face this problem, you may not save anyone next time. There is often no reason why things in the world can not be controlled. Good things have to take risks. The greater the good, the greater the risk. Heroes can’t save the world, but they know this and will continue to do good, and dare to face and bear the unpredictable consequences. After all, if you stop saving the world because of fear of risk, the world will probably be worse, You will feel guilty for not doing your best.

Some of the tragedies in this film are caused by things in the world, and some are caused by doing good deeds. In short, all sentient beings are bitter, and all sentient beings are evil. Life is like a cup. No one is wrong, but no one is necessarily right. So, benefactor, where is the way? Please watch Captain America 3: Civil War. After watching it, you are still confused and helpless. However, my friend, this is life.

3、 About roles

Iron Man: I like Tony here very much. He has a plump personality, a sense of responsibility and rational introspection as a hero; He was not paranoid. When he realized that the original idea had problems, he put down his pride, regardless of personal gains and losses, and quickly changed his action strategy, because he was not important, and doing things right was the most important. I think this is very heroic.

Captain: he is still a captain who advocates justice and freedom and sincerely believes that man himself has great power. He is obstinate and admirable. Some people say that he is either black or white and doesn’t know how to be flexible, but I think it takes more courage and strength to stick to intransigence in a world full of gray areas. His style always follows Peggy’s words: if you can compromise, compromise; If you can’t compromise, don’t. Even if the whole world says you are wrong, all you have to do is stand in place like a tree, then look into each other’s eyes and tell him: No, it’s you who want to change.

Winter Soldier: struggling in the awakening of survival instinct and conscience, he does not complain about his pain, but also dares to face the past stained with blood and evil. He is really a hero.

I like everyone else.

4、 On position

In my opinion, the reason for the difference between iron man and captain in the film is actually a correlation problem in statistical analysis. This problem is mentioned by illusion in the film: since Tony announced to become iron man, more and more superheroes have emerged, which brings challenges, and challenges cause conflicts and then trigger disasters. Therefore, there is a certain correlation coefficient between the two sets of data of “the emergence of superheroes” and “the occurrence of disasters”, and third-party supervision, It is an optimization scheme that can intervene and reduce this correlation coefficient in the future. This is a formula, which is the result of pure rational calculation of illusion.

Tony is a scientist. His thinking mode is very close to illusion. He chooses the optimal solution on the basis of rational analysis. Therefore, he believes that the avenger lacks a scientific decision-making mechanism participated by a third party. Only by establishing this mechanism can he impose more reasonable regulatory constraints on the avenger and control the unknown harm of action within the minimum range.

I see some people say that Tony is essentially taking a lawsuit stick line of playing with the law. He signs the agreement first, and then modifies the terms and conditions afterwards. Finally, by playing with bureaucratic means, the Avengers can continue to punish evil and promote good at will. I don’t think this is what the film means. Because Tony really sincerely wants to control the harm, he is trying to solve the loss and insecurity they bring to the public as the head of the avenger during the signing of the agreement. He did say when persuading the captain that the safety of the avenger can be strengthened by modifying and adding some details of the agreement, However, it is biased to think that he is playing with the law and taking the bureaucratic line. Moreover, what Tony tried his best to avoid from beginning to end was the word “do whatever you want”.

Roddy supports the signing of the agreement because he has been in the army for many years and agrees with and trusts the supervision and operation mode of the United Nations; Natasha, as a spy who is used to keenly estimating current events and making the most favorable decisions for herself, believes that she can have independent control only when one hand is still on the steering wheel. In order to reassure the public that she still has autonomy, she also chooses to support the agreement.

However, the problem with statistics is that although the calculated data results are objective, the interpretation of the results is relatively subjective. Correlation does not indicate causality. In fact, the calculation of illusion can not prove whether the emergence of disaster brings heroes or the emergence of heroes brings disasters. Moreover, statistics itself tends to remove differences and obtain group commonalities. This statistical result based on a large amount of data will be more accurate if applied to a large sample size group, but it may not be true if applied to a single individual. It must be analyzed in detail. Not to mention whether the amount of data used for the calculation of illusion is large enough, and whether the data selection will be biased due to the proportion of events experienced by existing heroes in MCU so far. Only for the two individuals of Captain and iron man, the conclusion of this statistical result is basically the opposite.

Tony is not only a protector, but also a creator. I must insert a paragraph here about my view that Tony always carries the black pot by force. Many successful people have a feeling that the greater your success, the more failures and mistakes you will experience. Throughout the history of human civilization, all progress processes contain countless mistakes, and great scientific breakthroughs are often accompanied by great risks. Tony is basically one of the most productive and outstanding inventors in the whole MCU and even the comic universe. With his achievements, he must have experienced millions of failures, and some of these failures must have serious consequences. What’s wrong with the use of technology by bad people and the creation of aochuang? People have never scolded Einstein for discovering the mass energy equation because the atomic bomb was invented. The greatest discovery must contain the most thorny danger. This is the basic operating rule of the universe. I never felt that letting Tony make a mistake was wronging him and forcing him to bear the black pot, Because I never expected a scientist who only made achievements but didn’t make mistakes. The important thing is that he is responsible for his mistakes, face them, correct them, and then move on, which is his charm.

Back to the point. In the movie, in Tony’s words, I’m a troublemaker from peper’s point of view, but I haven’t stopped, and I don’t want to stop. I think no one understands better than Tony that if he stops making mistakes and getting into trouble, he also stops creating and succeeding. According to Tony’s experience, some of the disasters he prevented are inseparable from himself, and he advocates rationality, doubts human nature, and believes that it is difficult for individual judgment to be objective and fair. Therefore, in order to avoid “doing bad things with good intentions”, the third-party supervision can evaluate and restrict the Avenger’s behavior from another perspective, which is a good way.

Looking at the captain’s experience so far, he is not a creator, he is just a protector, so he does not cause disasters, but stops them. Even if accidental casualties are caused in this process, it is an inevitable battle cost, which can be reduced by continuously improving personal ability, but it is not a major decision-making mistake of the Avengers. In his opinion, although the occurrence of disasters and the emergence of heroes are interrelated, the emergence of heroes is to stop disasters and save the world without making the situation worse. Therefore, third-party supervision is of little significance. And 117 countries, all countries have their own interests, the decision-making process must be inefficient and delay time, and the Avengers are tied up and unable to do their best; From the experience of New York and Washington, senior policymakers can even make things worse because of their own limitations. As long as the manager is human, there will be self-interest, variables and risks. If you don’t trust the avenger for this reason, you shouldn’t trust the United Nations.

It was said that the captain believed in the goodness of human nature, and all the people would finally understand their good intentions and believe in human free will and judgment. Therefore, he advocated that heroes should eliminate evil and promote good at will. This view is still biased. First of all, the captain doesn’t think that the masses will eventually understand them. On the contrary, he knows that many people don’t understand or even resent. However, as a superhero, if you want to save people, you must learn to accept this and insist on doing what you think is right in the voice of doubt. Secondly, the captain’s so-called freedom is not “punishing evil and promoting good at will”; He believes in people, but not everyone. He only believes in some individuals, such as the members of the Avengers. He believes that they have the right judgment and self-discipline, which can enable them to make the right choices without regulation, rather than making arbitrary choices.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here