Of the 4 tales, there are many nude scenes involving female nudity, including closeup shots of the female breasts, butt and pubic area. In the third tale, there are also scenes involving male nudity, showing shots of the butt and genital area.


All 4 tales includes some sort of sexual act, whether it is with another man/woman or themselves (female), though there are not any shots of penetration. Penetration is nearly shown in one segment, with the outer and inner labia visible in very close-up for a split second until a hand obscures the view, seeming to place an object inside.


The most explicit tale is most likely the third, where there are multiple close-up scenes of characters fondling each other’s breasts and hands washing their own or other pubic area. Very little is seen in the pubic area except pubic hair but the camera dwells upon that area quite extensively. About 30 young women are seen totally naked. Most of the nudity is of their backs but there is plenty of the front also shown.


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


Valerian borovcik’s immoral story is definitely a good film that has been neglected for a long time. Although it tells erotic stories, it does not affect the ideological depth of the film. All the film expresses is sex and sexual torture.

The film was shot in 1974 and consists of four unrelated erotic short films. Whether it is clothing, setting or performance, these short films are very exquisite, making people seem to be in the Louvre Museum and enjoy exquisite and graceful oil paintings. These short films have no connection in time, place, characters and events. The only thing is that they all tell “immoral stories”.

The solemn church choir sounded, and the film began with the subtitle: “love is pleasant, and doing what you want also reveals its essence. — quoted from brother Roosevelt”. I believe you will have a deeper understanding of this sentence after watching the whole film.

The first short film tells the story of a teenager and his cousin who first tasted sex at the high tide of the sea. The immorality of the story lies in incest. From the perspective of social ethics, the sexual behavior between cousins is obviously immoral, but for the two cousins, they are only two ignorant young people, full of curiosity and desire for sex. A teenager and a young girl get satisfaction and happiness through sex. It’s so simple. Sex gives them simplicity and beauty.

The second short film is divided into two paragraphs. The first paragraph tells the story of a devout female religious believer masturbating and masturbating in a secret room. The second paragraph tells that she was raped by a tramp when she went out. The story forms a sharp contrast. It is also sex, a beauty and an ugliness. The immorality of the story lies in blasphemy and rape. From the perspective of religious ethics, God is noble and great, while sex is low and humble, and even evil. The two are diametrically opposite, and water and fire are incompatible. However, in the girl, the two are perfectly integrated: while masturbating, all she thinks about is God and the Bible. Sex makes her happy both physically and mentally. In the second paragraph of the story, the girl goes out and is raped by a tramp – which is very sad and speechless. Sex can be good, but it can also be evil.

The third short film tells the story of the countess Elizabeth slaughtering a large number of virgins and having same-sex love with her subordinates. The immorality of this story lies in killing, metamorphosis and homosexuality (of course, now that society is enlightened, homosexuality is already a very normal existence). In order to satisfy her quirks, the countess slaughtered a large number of virgins and bathed them in their blood. Sex is conquest, selfishness and happiness for her. Succumbing to her own desires, being sexually enslaved and kidnapped, the countess’s behavior is no different from that of animals.

The fourth short film tells the story of incest between a daughter and his papal father and Bishop’s brother. The immorality of this story lies in incest and multi-p. On the one hand is the high sounding of the Pope and the bishop, on the other hand is their obscene and dirty sexual behavior, which forms a very sharp contrast. The whole scene of incest is full of all kinds of laughter, which makes the viewer particularly tangled – is immoral sex right or wrong. Sex can not only give people physical happiness, but also distort people’s soul.

Looking at the many immoral stories told in the four short films, we can probably understand the intention of the film director valerian borov CHIK: sex is complex and simple; Sex is beautiful and ugly; Sex is happy and evil; Sex is noble and despicable.

Sex has always been suppressed and vilified, but sex can also be very simple and beautiful. Such sex has nothing to do with morality. There is a comment that what you see in this film is what you want to see. I think this is the greatest praise to the director.

For thousands of years, human attitudes towards sex have been developing and changing. Ang Lee said in a movie dream in ten years, “I think the biggest charm of the film is that it can show the parts we don’t know.”. I think this sentence appropriately summarizes my impressions of the film – maybe we still have too many unknowns about sex.

In the last words, this film was made in 1974. Many scenes in the film are still shocking even today. At that time, it was very difficult to make such a film. I would like to pay tribute to the actors, video producers and directors.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here