Homesex movieGold (I) (2016) Movie Sex & Nudity

Gold (I) (2016) Movie Sex & Nudity

A man is seen in his underwear laying on the bed holding his robe open. A woman then joins him. They are next seen heavy kissing and dry humping on the bed.
A man and a woman are in a hot tub together and the woman appears to be topless although only her upper chest is shown. The man and woman begin kissing when another man interrupts them. The man hops out of hot tub nude standing in front of the second man and his nude backside is seen.
We see a man in a T-shirt and underwear, however this is not meant to be sensual.
An older man lays on a bed seductively in his underwear and a robe which is partially open. His girlfriend walks in and kisses him and lays on the bed. They make out, he asked if she wants to get under the sheets, and they continue making out.
Some sexual dialogue, in one scene a woman gives rubs her foot against a man’s groin area. No nudity.



Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com



In fact, the story is wonderful, but many people don’t understand it!

To truly understand the story, we must first understand two premises: first, the whole event is a scam carried out by the protagonist, Mike and childe; Second, except for the last three minutes, the other plots of the whole story are the protagonist’s answer to the FBI’s review.

Let’s start with the second premise: the story has the protagonist’s first person narration from the beginning. At first, I thought it was a normal narration. I understood after seeing more than half of the film. It turned out that it was a review answer to the FBI investigation from the beginning, and then I watched the film from the beginning. Friends who didn’t understand the film suggested going back and watching it again. Because of the investigation and Q & A, the protagonist certainly won’t admit that he is the mastermind, so many plots lie, deceive the investigators and the audience. It can be said that many witness plots are facts. The protagonist didn’t lie, but the key plot is that only two or three people were present. The protagonist lied, that is to say, it’s not the real development process of the story. For example, his relationship with his wife broke down, his meeting with Mike, his illness in the mountains, and he and childe went to the park to touch the tiger and get back the development right, etc. The last three minutes of the film are the real plot, which reveals the plot of many landlords lying. First of all, in the review, he said that his relationship with his wife had broken down because he was in collusion with beautiful public relations, and found that his wife was in collusion with her boss. His wife didn’t even answer his phone. During the review, he said that he didn’t benefit from fraud. On the contrary, he lost everything, including his family, because of fraud. And the truth? Once the review was over, he drove directly to his wife’s residence without any hesitation, and his wife didn’t have any surprised expression. The most important thing is that the review ended on October 18, and Mike’s check arrived on September 25. Where was it sent? Send it to his wife’s residence and 82 million directly to her home. Do you say their relationship has broken down? There is another detail. In the review, he said that his wife’s neighbors only care about whether the tree will grow to his house. After the protagonist finds the gold mine, it is no longer related to the tree, but to the gold mine. What about the facts? In the last three minutes of the film, when the protagonist returns to his wife’s house, her neighbor still cares about the tree and doesn’t know anything about the gold mine. The most direct evidence that he is the mastermind is, of course, the last 82 million and his smile. Of course, there are some hints in the film. For example, at the end of the review, he looked up and saw two birds flying freely in the sky; He mentioned in the review that he dreamed that he was a bird without feet flying in the sky (suggesting that he couldn’t catch a handle); During the review, he stressed that the old employees must sell some shares first. The one who didn’t sell always blamed him and asked him if he knew the truth; And the censor’s advice, advising him not to go abroad, not to shop, not to fly (I know it’s you, but there’s no evidence). About Mike’s death, the FBI said it was incredible. They didn’t run away after paying money, went back to the construction site, caught it and didn’t lock it up. They directly sent it to a helicopter. They fell dead and just ate their face. They cremated it before they determined their worth. They didn’t disclose many details.

The whole thing is the protagonist’s mastermind, Mike’s cooperation, childe’s coordination and finishing

RELATED ARTICLES

Catherine Zeta-Jones

Sunshine (1999)

Simple Men (1992)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments