There a few lengthy make out scenes that involve two characters naked under sheets. You can see a woman’s bare breasts, but no male nudity. Finally, there is another one that shows the man on top of the woman in missionary position, without any thrusting, but there are no sheets this time.
There is a commercial about condoms and several characters stating that the commercial makes them want to buy rubbers. Played for laughs.


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


Deadly weapon 2: the clean and metallic title, the rare position and weight of South African villains in the period of apartheid, the rush of colleagues killed one after another, the desire to “please personality” and become “friends”, Leo. There are indeed “ambiguous” and “explosive toilet”.

In history, the political situation in South Africa in 1989, like the world pattern at that time, experienced a certain degree of drastic changes. Although the period of apartheid in South Africa is not over, it is also coming to the end. In today’s Germany, the “Berlin Wall” was also announced as a tombstone of history in early November this year, and the “two Germany” were later unified. The “union of Soviet Socialist Republics” has not disintegrated, but it is also moving towards a so-called “new era” of “old and new”. As for China, especially the capital Beijing of “Chairman Cui of the starlight party” who has been subjected to moral violence on the Internet for three years, can I write it? Let’s make it known. But in that year, the “Mikhail sergeyevich Gorbachev” who was not a Pisces/ Михаил Сергеевич Горбачёв” However, I came to China and gave a group of “young fighters” a lot of “spiritual encouragement”. So from this point of view, I personally have a regretful idea that it is really impossible to “come true”: this sequel film, that is, deadly weapon 2, should choose the former Soviet Union or China as the core of the “villain”, rather than the fourth film starring “Jet Li”. If a fan asks me, “if it’s really what you want, who should play the Chinese villain in this sequel? In that era?” Don’t forget Zhang Yimou, who has always coveted the American “Oscar”, and in April of that year, “Lao Mou Zi” also released a commercial film in which he played the leading role. That film can also be regarded as a “classic” hardline action film on the theme of “crossing” in China’s early stage – “the situation of terracotta warriors in ancient and modern wars”. The hostess is still “Gong Li”. Yes, this film review on the sequel of the “deadly weapons series” wrote so many things “about him” at the beginning. I’m really sorry. Let’s get back to business.

In a word, the sequel of the deadly weapons series takes South Africa, which is still in the period of “apartheid system”, as the “villain”. I think there is some “political appeal” of the film, but the series is still “smart”, There was no choice at that time (Hollywood films around the 1980s) that had indeed reached the “saturation” level – “the former Soviet Union” was the core goal of “villains”. Instead, it seems that “the sword is on the wrong side”, which is determined by the “South African” diplomat, a “political figure” with high real power. (the “multi-ethnic” of the United States and the “apartheid system” of South Africa at that time. The film chooses “South African diplomat” as the villain, which shows that his country’s “democracy and freedom” has been successful.) Therefore, from the perspective of “high power”, the “double villains” in this sequel is the most insidious and vicious that is difficult to overcome. Because it has risen to the crisis level of “diplomatic storm”, there is no such basket, not even the “Asian” villain in the last film in 1998. It’s human smuggling. The United States turns a blind eye to China’s diplomacy. It is you Chinese who want to come to our free country, even if you risk your life and suffer Judging from the number of policemen sacrificed in this film, the “tragic” concentration of this sequel is also the most sufficient. In the “deadly weapons” series, I found that except that the third part originally intended to be the “finale” was the “Jack Travis” who smuggled and sold police guns, the other villains all had an older “behind the scenes” and a skilled cruel killer. The combination of villains with such a “combination of old and young” is also the “implicated” personal feeling of the sequel. The killer’s loyalty to the “black hand” is also relatively high. At least where the “black hand” goes, the killer follows, In addition to killing the female protagonist “van den Haas” in the film and “confessing” that he is the murderer who killed the ex-wife of the protagonist “Martin Rigg” (he thinks he can end it, so he tells it all. He really can only be a killer.) In addition to the plot paragraphs, it is basically like the tail of the black hand of the “Diplomat”. (this is a bit like the collocation of two decent protagonists.) In terms of villains’ shaping, I personally feel that this sequel also costs relatively more pen and ink. (after all, there is a “traitor” who is a “confidant” in the villain camp.) And I don’t know why the “double villains” in the first two films are matched, and the selected actors feel so “similar”. The first one is a little like “brothers”. This sequel says that there is no problem with “father and son”. Of course, the plot is not so, but has such a ridiculous feeling. It can only show that at least the first two parts of this action series, all the characters are relatively “synchronous”.

In this sequel, there is a very “gag” role of “Stain Witness” – Leo Gates. This “protection object” played by the actor “Joe Percy / Joe Pesci”, who is good at playing ruthless gangsters and street thieves who have achieved nothing. Personally, I only like his performance in this sequel, which does neutralize some of the too “tragic” plot content of this sequel (compared with the whole of this series) He is also more or less active. It is only the “monotonous” daily case solving life of “Martin Rigg” and “Roger Motta”. But what about the role of “Leo gates”? In the “deadly weapon” series, he completely overlaps with the main plot, which is the sequel. The rest of the third and fourth films are a “living treasure”, which really fully enlivens the “black humor” that this series already has, but more often, the character’s too fast lines, too dense speed, and the “linear” content that is not so closely related to the main plot just make this commercial series that focuses on “fighting wits and courage between police and bandits”, There is a little more unnecessary noise. However, this male number three is more or less the “mascot” of this commercial series, which can be regarded as so. This character is not only an “active atmosphere”, but also a “black and white” Leo Gates, the role of “gray humor” dissociating between good and evil, can indeed bring some substantive help to the police. For example, in this film, he sang in harmony with Uncle Roger to attract the attention of those security guards outside the “South African consulate”, so as to make the protagonist “Martin” make trouble. Moreover, this character is indeed an “old urchin” who lacks love. He is a “third party” who tries to integrate into the wonderful and exciting life of “Martin Rigg” and “Roger Motta”. ha-ha! Well, he not only wants to make “Shuangxiong” an “iron triangle”, but also clean up the messy “seaside villa” of the protagonist “Martin Rigg”. Therefore, this character is somewhat “cheap” and “flattering personality”, so it is reasonable that some people are “disgusted”. But the character “Leo” does not have more “bad hearts”, and sometimes even appears very clumsy. Think you’re smart. However, this character does make too much noise in the third / fourth film. Once there is his lens, he has some impulse to “fast forward”, which is also the fact of my personal perception. Because the two “double decent” of “Martin and Roger” are noisy enough. But this character still needs to be written down.

No one asked me, but if someone asked, where is your favorite sequel to this series? Can I say – is it “clothing”? ha-ha! Yes, it’s “clothing”. I really like “Martin Rigg” in this sequel. He wears a blue coat outside, a pure red shirt inside, and then wears the uninhibited shape of jeans. In addition, the character never trims his fluffy and wild brown hair. He really looks wild. In this film, the white and blue “86” worn by “Martin Rigg” in the second half of the film should be a baseball jacket. I personally like the matching of clothes with this feeling. I really want to buy a similar one, even if it is a little outdated. The costume design of other supporting actors in this film is also a more attentive one.

As for the plot itself, which part of the story I read is both nervous and “funny”? I think people who have seen this series may understand that the black uncle “Roger Motta” didn’t leave the toilet after pulling the “big bar” all night, because a “bomb” was installed under the toilet. As soon as he left, he disappeared. “Martin Rigg” promised that “Uncle Roger” would not be “well known” after he found it, because the image of “sitting numb” on his legs sitting on the toilet is really not “elegant”. As a result, the next scene was crowded, and bomb disposal teams, firefighters and even psychologists, including neighbors, heard the news. It can be said that “everyone knows”. But this time, at least in this film, we can’t blame “Martin Rigg”. Is face important or life important? The hero really can’t dismantle bombs, otherwise they won’t blow up a building at the beginning of the third book. This is where I am not satisfied with the opening of the third part. Although the “time bomb” pays tribute to the “Bomb toilet”, it is also a bomb, and its power is even more terrible. Even if the installation position is not in the huge hip that my partner “Roger” just joked, Wanyi, I mean, in case “Martin Rigg” cuts the wrong lead and detonates directly, That’s not “black humor”, just the end of the play. So where is the third part most unreasonable? It was Martin Rigg’s “joke” at the wrong time. That’s a bomb, too! And so close to them In this film, it is much “normal”. At least in the ordinary reaction of “logical thinking”, Martin Rigg can’t dismantle the bomb, so he goes to seek the help of “professionals”. This is reasonable. At least this character is completely clear when he should be normal and ignore when he should be crazy.

I saw some other fans’ short comments on the film. When talking about this part, I was somewhat “surprised”. It seems that the two police officers in this film really have some “ambiguous” elements. It’s not “ambiguous”, but at the critical time of life and death, it goes beyond the attachment of “friendship”. What if he gets blown up? I don’t have a chance to reveal: “it’s a blessing in my life to have a friend like you who is willing to live and die with me and doesn’t show (dislike) filth. I love you, my best friend.” It was Uncle Roger who was in tears but didn’t show it clearly, “Martin said,” I understand. “. Yes, this scene does have some “basic feelings”, but this is the difference of the “deadly weapon” series. These two friends with different personalities and different skin colors go beyond the life integration of “friendship” to a certain extent. I think it’s human to reveal such feelings at the moment when they are likely to die in an instant. As well as the “joke” of two close friends on the bitterness and joy of the chaff wife, it is understandable, and indeed some people feel very funny. This paragraph is somewhat “basic”, but it can be fully understood. Moreover, the “lethal weapon” series is a commercial model of the “left wing” thought. Apart from other things, taking the pairing of “black and white” as an example, it is the endless exposure of American “left-wing” thinking. And it is more or less an extremely “standard” American left wing. what do you mean? “We Americans accept all rivers, but you are not.”

In fact, this kind of thinking is not “innuendo” in this sequel and deadly weapon 4 nine years later, but it is clear. So really, this series is especially “politically correct”. From this point of view, it even “surpasses” the similar series of “bravery”. (of course, not really.) The sequel also includes scenes from the previous work of “tribute” (“Martin Rigg” falls into the swimming pool up to the seventh floor with the tainted witness “Leo gates” and the killer who wants to kill, similar to the madness of the first “Martin Rigg” who puts on handcuffs and jumps off a building together with people who commit suicide.) And in “deadly weapon 4” nine years later, there is a similar scene of going to the villain’s “snake’s nest” and making a scene. (in this film, the hero goes to the South African embassy to shoot the fish tank. In the fourth film, he breaks the glass screen in a Chinese restaurant and breaks the fire sprinkler without authorization. The character of “killer” shows his fierce eyes and looks at the close-up photography of the protagonist. However, the character of “killer” in this film does not say: “in South Africa, you have long died!”)

In fact, this movie is better seen at the beginning of the metal Title logo of “lethal weapon 2” at the beginning of the film. The number of “2” is as eye-catching as the blood stains slowly “fall” at the beginning of the film. (the last “4” of this series is almost the same as the clean opening.) As well as the assassination of a large number of police characters in the middle section, the mingmie part of the mingmie part, but at the end of the climax part, the fight between the decent and the villain, I personally think it is not meaningful. Certainly not as good as the fourth film, nor the first “lively”, as if it were “boxing”. But overall, the villains in this film are more memorable than the third. Personally, I think it’s just a person. The villain in the third film has no “sense of existence”. However, his crime is most in line with the deep-rooted social problem of “the proliferation of guns in the United States”. However, uncle Roger finally aimed at the villain who said “diplomatic immunity” and then shot him dead with one shot. It’s really fun. I found that in this film, uncle Roger also seems to occupy the voice of some “protagonists”. “Martin Rigg” is more like a “trusted partner” in ordinary life In this film, uncle Roger’s wife’s new car was damaged. However, what is more “fair” is that the “seaside villa” of the protagonist “Martin Rigg” has also been screened. However, later, “Martin”, who must take revenge, also used a trailer to directly “pull” and destroy the thief’s nest built by criminals in Hollywood hill. This scene can also be described as a “classic” fragment of this sequel.

Well, the personal comment record about this sequel is almost here. It’s time to end. I have some intuitive feelings like this. No matter how much hype is written, it can’t be a commercial series in the end. It still doesn’t have a strong sense of art. What it wants is the exciting plot of “ups and downs”, which is enough.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here