Two characters talk about if a foot massage is as bad as having sex with someone’s wife.
Jules and Vincent shower outside. We only see them from the waist up.
Butch and his girlfriend are kissing and Butch moves off-camera. Oral sex is implied. After this Butch takes a shower. He is nude, but nothing from the waist down is shown.
The Gimp wears a leather suit implied to be a sex suit. But this suit isn’t revealing at all.
A lot of sexual references with crude terms.


Two girls are talking about piercings, one of them mentions that she has a piercing on her genitals.
There is a brief rape scene, and it is the most sexual scene in the movie. It’s brief and no nudity is shown.


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


“Vulgar novel” has become a symbol. Anyone who says he likes watching movies can’t miss it. Anyone who has read the vulgar novel can’t help but say good. But what’s good about vulgar novel? Many people use the phrase “ring structure” or “multi angle”, and then talk about how fascinating the film dialogue is.

What’s good about vulgar novel? It’s really good in its “ring structure” and “multi angle”, but what are “ring structure” and “multi angle” and what are the advantages of these two?

The so-called “ring structure” may be relatively easy to understand, that is, the complementary structure of each paragraph in the film, the connection between the beginning and end, and so on. Such a structure, in this film, is used by the director to imply the cycle of violent stories. In other words, in reality, the plots in similar films are always happening and never stop.

The so-called “multi angle” not only observes the same event from different angles, but also shows the change of people’s role in different environments and states. At this point, Tarantino’s view is more like Jacques Derrida (Master of deconstructive Philosophy) in the film industry.

According to several examples, Vincent, as the hero in the “Xiangyan story”, is a protector compared with Mia (UMA Thurman) in the story, which can be said to be a quite positive role. But in the “boxer’s story”, Vincent became an unknown man who was shot only once. If you look at the two stories separately, there is no doubt that Vincent’s roles are very different in the two stories.

Another example: when Julius (Samuel Jackson) shot the people in the apartment with Vincent, there is no doubt that his image is a “killer”, but later in the film, when Bonnie and pumpkin head robbed the restaurant, it is obvious that Julius’s image is no longer a “killer” but a savior.

This “multi angle” undoubtedly tells us that each participant in an event has his own series of reasons and his own state to participate in the event, and the roles of the same person in different times and states are also very different.

The dialogue and performance of the film are also wonderful, but I personally think that the subtlety and deep meaning of the structure is the highlight of the vulgar novel

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here