A woman is shown topless inside a glass tube from the side and at a distance. Moments later a minimal outfit made of white straps is put on her.
After a woman unintentionally takes a shower in a mans apartment, she takes off her shirt to wring out the water in front of two men who quickly turn away. When one man walks away she is briefly seen topless.


A woman is given a change of clothes which she changes into in front of two men who quickly turn away. A topless woman changing is briefly shown.


Movie offers several instances of brief breast nudity.
A brief implied sex scene, only shoulders and above are shown.
A man engages in an off-camera oral sex act with a woman. Her facial expressions during the implied act is shown. She moans but nothing is actually shown. Comedic scene.
Mildly revealing “futuristic” clothing (spandex, thongs, translucent plastic, etc.) on various characters throughout the film.


Film review:Translated by www.rabudo-ru.com


If I had to choose a favorite director, I think I would choose Luc Besson, because on the whole, he can be regarded as a genius. In fact, when it comes to French directors, he is always a name that can not be ignored.

I like his appearance very much. He seems simple and honest, but he is actually very cunning. His eyes always reveal inspiration. Such a person is very suitable to play the role of a crazy scientist, because strange ideas will burst out from that head.

Luc Besson’s strength lies in that unlike European directors or French directors in the general sense, he always frowns or deep or avant-garde, tries to make all films into humanistic education publicity films, and always squints at Hollywood people on the other side of the ocean, However, Luc can easily control a clean and pollution-free green film such as blue sea and blue sky, while perfectly manipulating a Hollywood blockbuster with a fighting plot such as this killer is not too cold, or directing the epic of Joan of arc while making a joke series of taxis. All types are always easy for him.

Of course, he still won’t let go of entertainment films, like the fifth element.

This seems to be a science fiction film, and indeed, alien creatures, the destruction of the earth, mankind in the new century, cities in the new century, spaceships, high-tech weapons, all are essential elements of science fiction stories. Then, as always, the president of the United States carries the hope of the people of the world, a hero undertakes the dream of saving mankind, and the Hollywood style Americanized model of lone heroes. Therefore, the film was called the failure of Luc Besson’s career. It was criticized for having no connotation and no humanistic meaning. It was criticized for being full of stunts. It was criticized for not looking like that talented Luc Besson.

Oh, why? Why do you have to frown and dig out its so-called humanistic meaning when watching a movie? Why despise all Hollywood entertainment elements? Why can’t a big director be allowed to entertain like a ticket? Can’t you see that this is a comedy?

Out of the science fiction mode of thinking, in fact, this is just a comedy disguised under the appearance of science fiction films, entertainment. If it is regarded as a science fiction film, it is obviously a story without innovation and breakthrough. If it is regarded as a comedy, it will suddenly be full of innovation and unlimited creativity.

Why not prove it?

1. The ending is beautiful. This is comedy. This is the basic principle of drama.

2. In the process of watching the film, you absolutely laughed because he was absolutely humorous. Where is humor? For example, the stupid Orc warrior moves and acts as stupid as his appearance. For example, when boarding the plane, the alien face will be broken by the moving animal face. For example, the priest’s antics of putting on his holy clothes to meet the God and man. For example, when Lilu had no scruples about changing clothes, the men turned around. For example, the crazy host’s extremely fast speech speed. Like the general frozen in the fridge. Like Gary Oldman who saw another bomb. For example, there are too many people who can’t go down.

3. The production of this film is actually different from the so-called orthodox science fiction disaster film. For example, the president will appear in all movies. Do you think the president of this movie is familiar? By the way, he should look like a passer-by in all kinds of gangster movies, such as the one who beat George Clooney in the Rohan series (I forgot). However, he turned out to be the president. Isn’t that a joke in itself? The president in other disaster films, without exception, is an old man with gray hair and a heavy face. He looks worried about the country and the people and is ready to die generously at any time. This one? I have no decision-making power, and I am terribly afraid of disaster. Calling is a series of cliches of “what will I do on behalf of the federal government”. Isn’t that a joke?

4. Villains are usually evil, but Gary Oldman is evil and ridiculous this time, especially compared with the abnormal policeman in the killer. There are two kinds of villains now, either ugly, abnormal and hateful, or handsome and heroic. All the bad water flows in the stomach. When did you see a lame man with a funny head? Or a cripple who almost choked on a cherry? As soon as the villain appeared, the intention of comedy was obvious.

5. The image of the military is no longer ugly. Sometimes in disaster films, the military, as a government image, often opposes the protagonist to show the protagonist’s courage. This time, the general will molest the god man like a child, be punched in the lower body, go to the slum for help, be frozen in the refrigerator, and tremble in the monitoring room with the president.

After the solemn atmosphere in the first 15 minutes of the film, the story is more and more developing towards the routine of comedies, and there are more and more funny scenes. It’s all humor. I don’t know whether it’s American Hollywood, but at least it’s not European acrimony. I wonder how many so-called “humanists” can not find the pleasure of watching the film in this film?

Of course, there is pleasure, and this pleasure depends more on the director’s superb editing techniques. The two shots at different time and place are quickly connected together. The questions in shot a are answered by the people in shot B, which is not abrupt but very harmonious. The classic scene of super treble and fighting in film history is the perfect display of this editing technique. The as like as two peas of fighting and sound, the sound of each of the two accents is a heavy blow. The last two women are exactly the same in their arms. They are enough to show Luc Besson’s ability and never wait for a moment.

Another highlight of the film is music. The mixture of various musical styles complement each other with the film. In addition to the unforgettable treble, Bruce Willis’s Indian or Arab style music is not only novel but also harmonious, which is particularly impressive.

Of course, a good director is inseparable from a good actor. Bruce Willis, Gary Oldman and another Mira who achieved Luc Besson.

Bruce Willis is too good at playing this tough man who combines hardness with softness. It’s not the first time he has become the Savior of all mankind, so it’s too easy for him to continue to pretend to be down and take orders in danger, continue to show his muscles and agile hands, and continue to linger with the heroine for a moment. However, a little different this time, he needs to have a little humor, face his mother who never shows up but creates the most comic effect at the end, or do something embarrassing about secretly kissing a beautiful woman but being shot at the finger.

Gary Oldman is an old drama bone. He can be a wild SID, a police officer who is abnormal to murder, a charming Sirius, or a lame villain who is evil and stupid. With him, the film is complete. Sometimes the supporting actor will be more brilliant than the protagonist.

As for this perfect God with red hair and blue eyes, it’s enough to attract people to look at her actions just trained like a primitive person, her embarrassment when she can’t speak English, her innocent smiling face with an international pass, and her confusion and confusion about whether to protect mankind at the moment of life and death. If there is a God, I wish God were like this.

Perhaps “killer” is Luc Besson’s most successful film, but at least “the fifth element” is not a failure at all. Even if it disappoints countless “humanists” and “anti Hollywood”, it is still a successful comedy dressed in science fiction.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here