Homesex movieThe Shape of Water (2017) Movie Sex & Nudity

The Shape of Water (2017) Movie Sex & Nudity

The film contains a sex scene where a woman exposes one of her breasts to a man. The scene lasts about 10 seconds. They are both naked and engaging in sex.
There’s is a sex scene with a man on top of a woman exposing his rear, with thrusting seen. Same scene as mentioned above.
The main character is topless in the bath and it is implied that she is touching herself, nothing is seen and the action is implied. Not overly graphic.
Some frontal female nudity on two occasions but no genitalia is visable, both in a sexual context
Elisa’s pubic hair is somewhat visible when she is in the tub.

The creature (male) and the woman have sex on two occasions and there is some partial nudity, but nothing too severe.



Film review:Translated by XX www.rabudo-ru.com


A short film about the experience of women and ethnic minority artists in overcoming prejudice and realizing their creative ideals was broadcast at this Oscar. Among them, Salma Hayek said: the real human nature is hidden by stereotype, and our film industry must maintain the most sincere curiosity about it.

This sentence is the best response to some questions. The Oscar is just an award that follows the mainstream trend of thought in the United States. It has never been the “unified global aesthetic strongest Film Award”. The significance of this annual event to me is more an opportunity to discuss the film. It’s like a group of people around the hot Kang, outsiders eating melons, insiders having a water battle, and fans hugging for warmth. It’s very interesting.


There is only one kind of boring people: despise others’ preferences, do not respect others’ choices, and humiliate what they don’t like as non authority and garbage.

As an ordinary audience, I want to talk about why this film can win the best film at this academy award and the reasons why I love this film.

1、 More Oscar like

① The overwhelming advantage of being nominated for the technology award

To say a bad word is also a reality: most Chinese audiences judge a film only by “whether the story is fine or not”. They pursue sensory stimulation, are easy to be sensational, and lack artistic appreciation and technical common sense. Technical indicators are no less important than scripts.


Push forward the nomination overview of Oscar BP Technology Award in recent ten years (★ indicates Award):

2017 moonlight boy (photography, editing, Soundtrack)

2016 focus (clip)

2015 bird man (photography ★, mixing, sound effect editing)

2014 twelve years of slavery (editing, art guidance, fashion design)

2013 “escape from Tehran” (editing ★, mixing, sound effect editing, Soundtrack)

2012 artist (fashion design ★, Soundtrack ★, photography, editing, art guidance)

2011 King’s speech (photography, editing, mixing, art direction, fashion design, Soundtrack)

2010 bomb squad (editing ★, mixing ★, sound editing ★, photography, Soundtrack)

2009 Slumdog Millionaire (photography ★, editing ★, mixing ★, Soundtrack ★, sound effect editing)

2008 no country for old people (photography, editing, mixing, sound editing)

stick out a mile. When a film is not nominated for any technology award, it can basically be judged that it has no chance with BP. Through the screening and exclusion of this nomination list (in line with the double nominations of script and Technology Award), it is clear that this BP is a dispute between “water shaped story” and “three billboards”. Compared with water, which almost won the technical nomination, 3BB was only nominated for editing and soundtrack, which was slightly inferior in momentum.

② Ideological elements are in line with the conservative choice of the college

In a word, many people always talk about “political correctness”. In addition to the “accident” of bird man, the best films in the past five years are closely related to hot social issues and meet the demands of different people. Oscar’s “de artistry” is the current trend.

I put quotation marks above to express my doubts about this general view. Is “art” and “political correctness” in conflict? Is “political correctness” vulgar and boring and should not be advocated? When was “political correctness” stigmatized as automatically standing opposite truth and art?

We should be vigilant and reflect on this trend: it is an insult to the artist and a sorrow to the audience to speculate on any painstaking artistic creation as flattery and speculation on capital.

2、 Aesthetic love

If you want to accept the beauty and love of this film, the main premise is to have multiple aesthetic abilities, which doomed a large number of people to be unable to accept this film. Their judgment of “beauty” is single. Exquisite makeup, palaces filled with works of art and beautiful natural scenery are pleasing to the eye. In addition, things beyond the scope of common sense are curious and ugly.

Mark hill, the monster designer of the film, said that the designers spent several months repeatedly debugging and pinching the face to ensure that the fishman has a “protagonist face”: a perfect nose, properly spaced eyes and gills that do not affect his appearance. The top always carries the back view photos of the fishman, so as to ask others for advice at any time—— These efforts have only bad taste in the eyes of people who don’t understand customs.

RELATED ARTICLES

Catherine Zeta-Jones

Sunshine (1999)

Simple Men (1992)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments